While the availability of high quality professional psychology training in Canada is comparable to that in the US at the doctoral and internship levels (as indexed by the CPA accreditation standards, accreditation process and APA's recent proposal to stop accrediting Canadian programs), training in clinical neuropsychology at the post-doctoral level is less common and accessible. The dearth of formal clinical neuropsychology post-doctoral training programs in Canada is due, in part, to different funding mechanisms than are in place in the US and in part due to different expectations/demands for training at the advanced level. Due to the limited availability of 2-year post-doctoral programs in clinical neuropsychology, Canadian students who obtained their Ph.D.'s after January 1, 2005 face a significant barrier in applying for the ABPP (cn) Diploma. This situation has prompted the ABCN to consider an interim mechanism for accepting Canadian applicants to eligibility for the ABPP (cn) process. What follows is a a set of interim criteria, the purpose of which is to allow time for the development of formal 2-year neuropsychology fellowship programs in Canada that meet the Houston training guidelines. These interim procedures will be reviewed at two year intervals by the ABCN Board of Directors until such time that, in consultation with Canadian ABCN diplomates on the BoD or involved in the Canadian training community, it is determined that they are no longer required.

The same didactic, academic and clinical training experiences at the Doctoral and Internship level will be required of Canadian and US applicants, including the same requirements for Knowledge Base and Skills.

At the level of Residency Education and Training in Clinical Neuropsychology, Canadian applicants are required to have two years of full-time post-doctoral practice supervised by a practicing clinical neuropsychologist. Supervised practice should allow for an affiliation with or access to an academic medical center where the trainee can access patient rounds, didactic sessions and other training opportunities (e.g., medical rounds, imaging training, etc). Interactions with other residents in medical specialties and allied professions is encouraged but not required. Supervised practice should allow the applicant exposure to and experience with a broad range of medical/neurological disorders or conditions and train them in the provision of a variety of clinical neuropsychology services (assessment, history taking, interview, feedback, report-writing, consultation, program planning, and intervention). The exit criteria for the residency are the same, namely:

1. Advanced skill in the neuropsychological evaluation, treatment and consultation to patients and professionals sufficient to practice on an independent basis;
2. Advanced understanding of brain-behavior relationships;
3. Scholarly activity, e.g., submission of a study or literature review for publication, presentation, submission of a grant proposal or outcome assessment.
4. A formal evaluation of competency in the exit criteria 1 through 3 shall occur in the residency program.
5. Eligibility for state or provincial licensure or certification for the independent practice of psychology.
6. Eligibility for board certification in clinical neuropsychology by the American Board of Professional Psychology.

In summary, the only deviations from the Houston Guidelines is the requirement of at least one board-certified clinical neuropsychologist on the program's faculty (this is not yet strictly applied to the US residencies) and more flexibility for those who seek out comparable supervisory and training experiences where formal residency programs do not yet exist.